Managing Performance Through Training And Development 6th Edition By Saks – Test Bank
Chapter 11: Training Evaluation
TRUE/FALSE
1. Training evaluation is a process that helps organizations determine if expected training outcomes actually materialize.
ANS: T PTS: 1 REF: 325
2. Training evaluation is basically a single procedure focused on the level of satisfaction reported by trainees after training.
ANS: F PTS: 1 REF: 325
3. Training evaluation is undertaken for a variety of reasons. Some of the most salient reasons include identifying the costs and benefits of a particular training initiative and determining if expected training outcomes materialized.
ANS: T
The other 4 explanations would also be correct – page 326
PTS: 1 REF: 325|326
4. The American Society for Training and Development reported that organizations rarely perform any kind of training evaluation.
ANS: F PTS: 1 REF: 326
5. Those organizations that perform training evaluations tend to focus their metrics on job performance improvements as a direct result of training.
ANS: F
Evaluations tend to be measure trainee reactions to the training (like, dislike etc.)
PTS: 1 REF: 326
6. Evaluating training programs requires knowledge about research design, measurements, and data analysis.
ANS: T PTS: 1 REF: 328
7. Decisions to evaluate training programs are often made as a direct result of senior management requests.
ANS: T PTS: 1 REF: 328
8. Formative evaluations provide data about the worthiness or effectiveness of a training program.
ANS: F PTS: 1 REF: 330
9. Descriptive and causal evaluations measure basically the same outcome.
ANS: F PTS: 1 REF: 330
10. The COMA model and the Decision-Based Evaluation model are the most widely used training evaluation methods.
ANS: F PTS: 1 REF: 330
11. Kirkpatrick’s hierarchical model has four levels. Recently, Kirkpatrick replaced the fourth level with a measurement of return on investment.
ANS: F
The fourth level still measures results; ROI was added
PTS: 1 REF: 331
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.